Issue 31426 - Code Improvements for user's ortographycs dictionary
Summary: Code Improvements for user's ortographycs dictionary
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
Depends on:
Reported: 2004-07-13 14:14 UTC by beakman2006
Modified: 2013-02-07 22:39 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description beakman2006 2004-07-13 14:14:43 UTC
My father is 70 years old brazilian laywer. He thinks the OO portuguese 
dictionary is poor, so he uses very much the user's ortographic dictionary, 
aka "stantard.dic". 
Using OO since 98 for daily work, he thinks OO would be better if he can : 
- Don't have limit to store words, or if this limit can be expanded by 10; 
- Don't store "-" from automatic hifenation; 
- If he can open, edit and save the "stardard.dic", and why not use XML to 
store the information instead DBASE ? 
It would be great all this changes, and he tanks you a lot, OO developers, and 
put yourself for further explanations about his point of view. 
Fernando and his 
father Suamy
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2004-07-13 15:18:05 UTC
reassigned to BH.
Comment 2 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 14:48:39 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements".