Issue 31560 - ooo20040704: build fails in sysui/desktop/solaris
Summary: ooo20040704: build fails in sysui/desktop/solaris
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 31015
Alias: None
Product: gsl
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: Sun Solaris
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: nospam4obr
QA Contact: issues@gsl
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-07-16 08:03 UTC by pavel
Modified: 2004-07-16 14:12 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description pavel 2004-07-16 08:03:50 UTC 
Hi,

I'm doing build QA on community branch cws_src680_ooo20040704.

Build on Solaris/SPARC fails in sysui/desktop/solaris with:

Creating GNOME .applications file ..
---------------------------------
Creating GNOME .keys file ..
---------------------------------
## Building pkgmap from package prototype file.
ERROR in ../../unxsols4.pro/misc/solaris/prototype:
    no object for
<../../unxsols4.pro/misc/solaris/usr/share/application-registry/openoffice680.applications>
found in root directory
    no object for
<../../unxsols4.pro/misc/solaris/usr/share/mime-info/openoffice680.keys> found
in root directory
pkgmk: ERROR: unable to build pkgmap from prototype file
## Packaging was not successful.
dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../../unxsols4.pro/misc/solarispkg.flag'
'---* TG_SLO.MK *---'

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/ultra/BuildDir/ooo_cws_src680_ooo20040704_src/sysui/desktop/solaris

Any details available on request.
Comment 1 pavel 2004-07-16 08:10:00 UTC 
set target
Comment 2 christof.pintaske 2004-07-16 13:40:05 UTC 
cp->obr: please have a look ...
Comment 3 nospam4obr 2004-07-16 14:03:47 UTC 
Fixed in milestone m48. Please fetch rev 1.3 of the file 'prototype'.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 31015 ***
Comment 4 pavel 2004-07-16 14:12:45 UTC 
Yes - it fixed the problem.

Thank you (sorry for not searching for it before filing this).