Issue 3269 - Default Row Height
Summary: Default Row Height
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: 641
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords:
: 3361 3704 4437 4492 4535 4717 4725 5167 5399 9222 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-02-28 23:48 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2017-08-10 19:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2002-02-28 23:48:13 UTC
The default row height is set to 0.0" for all cells when first starting.
I have been unable to find a place to over ride this setting.
Comment 1 peter.junge 2002-03-01 08:24:05 UTC
Hi Jeff,
first were did you find that the default row height is set to 0.0"?
Does that mean you're seeing only border lines in the moment?
There are two dialogs dealing with row heights. The first is
'format->row->height...' this dialog is different from zero to me. The
second is 'format->row->optimal height...'. The value you find there
is of course zero because it means 'optimal height + this'.
If you're not satisfied with the default height then open an empty
spreadsheet, use 'format->row->height...', enter you're desired value
and save the spreadsheet as the default template.

Regrds, Peter
Comment 2 peter.junge 2002-03-01 08:24:34 UTC
works for me.
Comment 3 peter.junge 2002-03-05 10:47:03 UTC
Hi Jeff,
another idea, does your OOo find any font?
Regards, Peter
Comment 4 frank 2002-03-06 08:31:48 UTC
*** Issue 3361 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 ooo 2002-03-07 14:41:33 UTC
This seems to be a fonts problem, an error of the RedHat distribution, see
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?msgId=230034&listName=users
Comment 6 peter.junge 2002-04-03 12:34:34 UTC
*** Issue 3704 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 frank 2002-05-06 07:50:35 UTC
*** Issue 4492 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 frank 2002-05-06 08:07:54 UTC
closed as Invalid.
Comment 9 frank 2002-05-06 08:29:59 UTC
*** Issue 4535 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 frank 2002-05-07 09:39:04 UTC
*** Issue 4437 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 frank 2002-05-13 08:49:03 UTC
*** Issue 4437 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 12 frank 2002-05-13 08:51:11 UTC
*** Issue 4725 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 13 frank 2002-05-13 08:52:30 UTC
*** Issue 4717 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 14 frank 2002-05-23 07:22:20 UTC
*** Issue 5167 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 frank 2002-05-30 14:01:09 UTC
*** Issue 5399 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 16 kandew 2002-11-14 01:08:39 UTC
*** Issue 9217 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 17 kandew 2002-11-14 21:55:05 UTC
*** Issue 9222 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 18 peter.junge 2002-11-28 14:30:54 UTC
*** Issue 9222 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***