Issue 33067 - API: sc.AccessibleEditableTextPara_HeaderFooter::XAccessibleEventBroadcaster
Summary: API: sc.AccessibleEditableTextPara_HeaderFooter::XAccessibleEventBroadcaster
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: App Dev
Classification: Unclassified
Component: api (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: sascha.ballach
QA Contact: issues@api
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-17 09:07 UTC by chne
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description chne 2004-08-17 09:07:07 UTC 
the listener does not work
To reproduce this behavior just call inside a solar shell:
%SOLARENV%\bin\checkapi -o
sc.AccessibleEditableTextPara_HeaderFooter::com::sun::star::accessibility::XAccessibleEventBroadcaster
Comment 1 chne 2004-08-17 09:07:30 UTC 
.
Comment 2 chne 2004-08-17 09:28:43 UTC 
like #i33055# the office crashes while closing the clac doc. And liike #i33055#
the interface does not work only the first time. A second run results in a ok
test state.
Comment 3 sascha.ballach 2004-09-08 21:03:23 UTC 
take it
Comment 4 sascha.ballach 2004-10-14 18:01:12 UTC 
duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 33055 ***
Comment 5 sascha.ballach 2004-10-15 09:33:50 UTC 
reopen
Comment 6 sascha.ballach 2004-10-15 09:34:18 UTC 
back to you
Comment 7 chne 2004-11-01 13:13:27 UTC 
cn-sab: this bug occure also in src680_m59. The listener was not called and if
you try to close the document after the test the office crashes.
Comment 8 chne 2004-11-01 16:25:49 UTC 
This bug is not longer relevant, because
1.) the crash has nothing to do with the implementation object which is
describet in the summary. The crash occure on another object. The new bug id is
 i36277
2.) the listener was called. There is a bug in the test case i36467
Comment 9 chne 2004-11-01 16:26:04 UTC 
close