Issue 35091 - Locale file for language Dzongkha
Summary: Locale file for language Dzongkha
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 36827
Alias: None
Product: Internationalization
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: pema.geyleg
QA Contact: issues@l10n
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-07 09:57 UTC by pema.geyleg
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:00 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
locale file named dz_BT.xml created using gedit (24.29 KB, text/xml)
2004-10-07 10:02 UTC, pema.geyleg 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description pema.geyleg 2004-10-07 09:57:27 UTC 
This is the locale file for Dzongkha language. However, regarding the collation
rules we are usually directed to the
http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/userguide/Collate_Customization.html. Since I
had already submitted a locale data in ldml formate in common repository which
follows the collation rules specified above.So I have tried implementing the
Collation rules in terms of it...
Comment 1 pema.geyleg 2004-10-07 10:02:02 UTC 
Created attachment 18194 [details]
locale file named dz_BT.xml created using gedit
Comment 2 pavel 2004-10-07 12:02:07 UTC 
Eike, please have a look.

pema_geyleg: Have you already signed JCA?
Comment 3 ooo 2004-10-11 15:05:41 UTC 
Pema,

Sorry, but simply putting the LDML data in the LC_COLLATION section of a locale
data file doesn't work. Please submit only locale data that complies with
i18npool/source/localedata/data/locale.dtd. If you need collation that is
different from the one ICU (currently v2.6) provides (is this really the case in
case of Dzongkha?), then please use the mechanism of i18npool/source/collator
and it's data subdirectory.

Though I didn't try it (did you?) I also doubt that the locale data would
actually work. There is no DateSeparator defined, no Time100SecSeparator,
TimeSeparator equals the ListSeparator and is more than one character, and I
also doubt that the format codes match the prerequisites lined out as comments
in the locale.dtd

Therefor reassigning this issue back to you. Please correct the data, try to
test it in a non-product build if possible as described in locale.dtd (I will
provide means to check locale data in product-builds in a later CWS, currently
only available in non-product builds), and please fill in the JCA form, see
http://www.openoffice.org/contributing/programming.html
If done, please reassign this issue to me.

@Pavel: not much sense in adding a comment "Eike, please have a look." without
reassigning the issue to me.. I might also have never seen it.

Thanks
Eike
Comment 4 stx123 2005-01-19 15:43:15 UTC 
Hi Pema, as Martin pointed out on the releases list we are coming
closer to 2.0 Beta.
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&msgNo=8258
Is your work making progress and would be ready for 2.0
as the target milestone indicates?
Thanks, Stefan
Comment 5 ooo 2005-02-16 19:41:30 UTC 
Pema, please, if this should be integrated for OOo2.0 the locale data must be
completed as requested. The deadline is end of this month, 2005-02-28. If the
data is not ready by then I will retarget the issue to OOo2.0.1

Thanks
Eike
Comment 6 ooo 2005-03-24 11:46:46 UTC 
Dupe.


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 36827 ***
Comment 7 ooo 2005-03-24 11:47:54 UTC 
Closing dupe.