Issue 35881 - URL insertion permanent after auto completion rejection
Summary: URL insertion permanent after auto completion rejection
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.3
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: stefan.baltzer
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: needmoreinfo, oooqa
: 35878 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-20 15:30 UTC by osavill
Modified: 2004-12-05 19:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description osavill 2004-10-20 15:30:14 UTC 
Open a new "Text Document"

Setup:
   Enter "foo1@bar.co.uk"
      The auto URL feature turns this into a mailto: URL

The issue:
   As if the document had just been opened. Cursor to the end of "foo1@bar.co.
uk" and...
   Enter "f"
      Auto Completion prompts with "foo1@bar.co.uk"
   Reject prompt with Backspace key.

Editor now appears to be in permanent "insert URL" mode. From now on any 
character entered is simply added with an underline and a link to the mailto:

When inserting a fresh URL things like ',' and ' ' terminate the URL entry, 
perhaps editing a URL should have the same rules.
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2004-10-21 07:41:25 UTC 
Reassigned to SBA.
Comment 2 lohmaier 2004-10-24 16:08:45 UTC 
cannot reproduce.
AutoComplete is triggered after typing three letters. (so you have to type "foo"
to have the completion offered)

Anyway, if you are in the insert hyperlink-mode press <cursor-right> to pass the
virtual formatting mark. You can now continue with the current paragraph style
(no link).
If you already typed some text that should not be part of the link, highlight it
and choose Format|Default form the menu (or use the contextmenu -> default)

If this doesn't help, give more details.
Comment 3 lohmaier 2004-10-24 16:10:45 UTC 
*** Issue 35878 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 thackert 2004-12-05 18:35:57 UTC 
I have seen that there was no answer to cloph's question? Does it mean that the issue is solved? I 
cannot reproduce it either with OOo-1.1.4rc, so it seems to be solved there. Could this issue be closed 
by osavill then, please?
Comment 5 lohmaier 2004-12-05 19:32:41 UTC 
resolving invalid since no response from reporter.

Please reopen this issue when you can give the requested information.
Comment 6 lohmaier 2004-12-05 19:33:24 UTC 
closing issue.

reopen if you can give more info.