Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 37202
English thesaurus files are missing
Last modified: 2013-02-24 20:34:11 UTC
share/dict/ooo/ lacks the English thesaurus files, i.e. th_en_US_new.dat and th_en_US_new.idx. Interestingly, this directory contains a file WordNet_License.txt which is the license that belongs to those missing files. Also, dictionary.lst has an entry for these files already. Note that other files like en_US.aff, en_US.dic, and hyph_en_US.dic are there, so I don't think that this is a problem with my installation.
this is prio 2 now. Is there any other issue for 2.0 thesaurus?
I'm not aware of any 2.0 specific issues, but issue 21348 sounds like it should be fixed for 2.0 maybe.
mh->is: can we have a look at this, this is a 2.0 Beta Stopper.
Hi Martin, the writingaids.zip (m63) contains the following 18 files, that will be installed to share/dict/ooo : share/dict/ooo/en_GB.dic writingaids_zip/en_GB.dic share/dict/ooo/en_US.dic writingaids_zip/en_US.dic share/dict/ooo/hyph_da_DK.dic writingaids_zip/hyph_da_DK.dic share/dict/ooo/hyph_de_DE.dic writingaids_zip/hyph_de_DE.dic share/dict/ooo/hyph_en_GB.dic writingaids_zip/hyph_en_GB.dic share/dict/ooo/hyph_en_US.dic writingaids_zip/hyph_en_US.dic share/dict/ooo/hyph_it_IT.dic writingaids_zip/hyph_it_IT.dic share/dict/ooo/hyph_ru_RU.dic writingaids_zip/hyph_ru_RU.dic share/dict/ooo/it_IT.dic writingaids_zip/it_IT.dic share/dict/ooo/en_GB.aff writingaids_zip/en_GB.aff share/dict/ooo/en_US.aff writingaids_zip/en_US.aff share/dict/ooo/it_IT.aff writingaids_zip/it_IT.aff share/dict/ooo/README_en_GB.txt writingaids_zip/README_en_GB.txt share/dict/ooo/README_it_IT.txt writingaids_zip/README_it_IT.txt share/dict/ooo/WordNet_license.txt writingaids_zip/WordNet_license.txt share/dict/ooo/dictionary.lst writingaids_zip/dictionary.lst share/dict/ooo/DicOOo.sxw writingaids_zip/DicOOo.sxw share/dict/ooo/FontOOo.sxw writingaids_zip/FontOOo.sxw Therefore there seems to be a problem in the build process for the writingaids.zip.
mark as duplicate to 35778. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 35778 ***
close issue.