Issue 37828 - Java framework: review direct mode
Summary: Java framework: review direct mode
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: udk
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680
Hardware: All Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: Olaf Felka
QA Contact: issues@udk
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-25 09:03 UTC by joachim.lingner
Modified: 2005-01-10 11:56 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description joachim.lingner 2004-11-25 09:03:48 UTC 
It turned out that the direct mode used in SDK prevented the use of unopkg. This
was definetly not the intention of this mode.
Comment 1 joachim.lingner 2004-11-25 13:07:34 UTC 
We clarified the requirements for the registration of Java components. With the
result that regcomp and  unopkg which are used in the SDK use the Java settings
from the office. 

Reviewing the direct mode, I concluded that the bootstrap parameter
UNO_JAVA_JFW_DISABLE and UNO_JAVA_JFW_PLUGIN will be removed. There is no real
use - case for them.

UNO_JAVA_JFW_DISABLE:
is used in direct mode. The direct mode, however, is used to make Java work when
no user or share data are available. So disabling that mode seems to be a
contradiction.

UNO_JAVA_JFW_PLUGIN:
is used in direct mode. By using this parameter it is not necessary to supply a
javavendors.xml file. However, that file is an integral part of the framework.

For the above stated reasons I will remove the support of these bootstrap
parameters.
Comment 2 joachim.lingner 2004-11-26 10:19:58 UTC 
fixed in cws jl15
Comment 3 joachim.lingner 2004-12-02 10:59:27 UTC 
JL->OF: Please verify that the manual selection of Java works.
Comment 4 joachim.lingner 2004-12-02 11:00:07 UTC 
.
Comment 5 joachim.lingner 2004-12-02 11:00:28 UTC 
.
Comment 6 Olaf Felka 2004-12-13 15:14:56 UTC 
of: verified in cws jl15
Comment 7 Olaf Felka 2005-01-10 11:56:33 UTC 
of: is ok in src680m71