Issue 39333 - Mail merge to e-mail should allow static attachments
Summary: Mail merge to e-mail should allow static attachments
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial with 12 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
: 83837 99522 109590 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 97765
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-12-20 12:49 UTC by jmills
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description jmills 2004-12-20 12:49:56 UTC
The new mail merge is much better: However, it doesn't solve the scenario
where I write a e-mail to someone (which the contents is created from the merge
process), and attach various attachments (possibly PDF, possibly different)
which don't change..

At present it seems you either attach the merged document, or it's all text?
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2004-12-20 13:20:18 UTC
MRU->HI: please evaluate and reassign if necessary.
Comment 2 jmills 2004-12-20 13:41:43 UTC
(This would allow you to send an email like:

Dear Scott

Isn't StarOffice and OpenOffice great?  You can read all about them in 
the attachement ...

... and attach the data sheet 

The "Dear Scott" and the email address is the bit that gets customised...)
Comment 3 h.ilter 2005-03-10 15:59:08 UTC
Passed to CJ.
Comment 4 h.ilter 2006-10-23 15:44:10 UTC
Added OS to CC
Comment 5 h.ilter 2006-10-24 13:14:43 UTC
Reassigned to FL
Comment 6 frank.loehmann 2007-09-06 22:00:32 UTC
Set target to OOo later.
Comment 7 h.ilter 2007-11-22 14:24:53 UTC
*** Issue 83837 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 michael.ruess 2009-02-23 12:25:52 UTC
*** Issue 99522 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 9 michael.ruess 2010-02-25 14:49:52 UTC
*** Issue 109590 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***