http://documentation.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=2198

the ddsshguide.html doc should be upgraded and the faq should link to it. Pursue
this.

Added items to Documentation FAQs

Is there a reason that the new questions were not placed in the existing
site_maintainers directory? To me, it does not make sense to have two:

Existing: http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/site_maintainers/index.html

New: http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/contributing/index.html

While the site_maintainers directory was not linked to the index page, its
existence was brought up for discussion and hopeful inclusion on the mail list,
yet no one responded:

http://documentation.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgId=1700217

The site_maintainers directory has also been referred to in several past
discussions, so while it has not been publicly linked, its existence has not
been hidden from the eyes of the documentation project.

Please may we move the new faqs to th existing directory, delete the new
directory, and link the site_maintainers directory to the FAQ index page?

The faq was not written between feb 19th and yesterday. It is now completed. You
asked, I provided. As to New FAQs, I was under the impression that all it
included was whatever was on OOoAuthors so I added it to the doc project. The
task was left idle and cleaning up the task list was important and this was easy
to do.

So there was lots of opportunity to do the work prior to yesterday. I will
reassign this to you and you take care of it.

I am reassigning this issue to the documentation project, as I am out of line to
challenge the project leader in the way that I did.

marking issue as resolved, to place it back into the state designated by the
project leader.

marking issue that I reported as closed, as the task is considered as an
accomplished task by the project lead.

kcarr, please see this issue as another example