Issue 43978 - the presentation show closes open vectorial objects made with OO1.4
Summary: the presentation show closes open vectorial objects made with OO1.4
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 37793
Alias: None
Product: Impress
Classification: Application
Component: viewing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0 Beta
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: thb
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-03-03 11:33 UTC by psemal
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
exemple of vectorial drawing correctly displayed in the editing view but wrong in the show view (52.68 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.impress)
2005-03-03 11:37 UTC, psemal 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description psemal 2005-03-03 11:33:55 UTC 
I made several impress presentations with OO1.4.
Some of these presentations include vectorial drawings made with drawing 1.4 and
everything is fine. Some of the vectorial drawings are open objects and
correctly dispayed in the editing view of OO1.4 or in the show view of OO1.4.

I tryed to open these files with the OO.2 beta (and previous releases of OO2).
If the editing view is perfect with preserved open vectorial objects, the show
view is totally different : all the open forms are now closed with continuous
lines. If I return in the editing view the forms are again open.

It is like if the rendering module for the Impress is not able to recognize open
vectorial forms.
Comment 1 psemal 2005-03-03 11:37:02 UTC 
Created attachment 23285 [details]
exemple of vectorial drawing correctly displayed in the editing view but wrong in the show view
Comment 2 wolframgarten 2005-03-03 11:39:50 UTC 
Priority changed.
Comment 3 wolframgarten 2005-03-03 11:48:14 UTC 
Reproducible.
Comment 4 wolframgarten 2005-03-03 11:48:49 UTC 
But I think this is duplicate to i37793. Is it?
Comment 5 thb 2005-03-03 13:12:40 UTC 
@wg: Yes, indeed. Setting to duplicate.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 37793 ***
Comment 6 thb 2005-03-03 13:13:41 UTC 
And closing...