Issue 58720 - DevGuide: Root homepage missing link to vanilla HTML version
Summary: DevGuide: Root homepage missing link to vanilla HTML version
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: App Dev
Classification: Unclassified
Component: api (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: jsc
QA Contact: issues@api
URL: http://api.openoffice.org/DevelopersG...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-01 10:18 UTC by kaibackman
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description kaibackman 2005-12-01 10:18:28 UTC
The root homepage for the Developer's Guide at:
http://api.openoffice.org/DevelopersGuide/DevelopersGuide.html
is missing a link to the plain HTML version of the documentation. Only the 
XHTML and PDF versions are linked to. Not fun as IE derivatives don't support 
XHTML directly and the PDF version is less up to date than the HTML version.

Fix: Please include a link to the HTML version at:
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/DevelopersGuide/DevelopersGuide.htm
Comment 1 grsingleton 2005-12-01 11:53:01 UTC
Boy I do wish the documentation project had this document but ... Changed
component since we do not.
Comment 2 christianjunker 2006-01-10 14:23:41 UTC
cyb->jsc: don't know whether html version is still included. Please take a look.
Comment 3 jsc 2006-01-18 13:22:46 UTC
mmh, the plain html version is not supported for the 2.0 version but it will
change with the next verison. The DevGuide is transformed in a Sun specific
documentation format which allows us easier maintainance in our documentation
department. One benefit will be that we will get smaller and more usable html pages.
The current available and linked PDF version is up-to-date. 
So in fact of replacing the current version with the new one in the near future
i won't do anyhting on this issue at this time, sorry.
Comment 4 jsc 2006-01-18 14:33:51 UTC
closed