Issue 61633 - transparency gets not exported to PDF in all cases
Summary: transparency gets not exported to PDF in all cases
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Impress
Classification: Application
Component: save-export (show other issues)
Version: 680m155
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: wolframgarten
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords: oooqa, regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-05 18:23 UTC by floeff+ooo
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:20 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
example presentation (873.70 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.impress)
2006-02-05 18:24 UTC, floeff+ooo 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description floeff+ooo 2006-02-05 18:23:39 UTC 
Beginning with newer builds (2.0.1 did not have this problem), transparency gets
not exported to PDF in all cases.

Look at the attached presentation and export it as PDF. Settings (tagged,
quality etc.) do not seem to matter at all.

Page 1 is allright, but page 2 has a white background. It should have a gradient
with transparency.
Comment 1 floeff+ooo 2006-02-05 18:24:23 UTC 
Created attachment 33860 [details]
example presentation
Comment 2 thackert 2006-02-05 18:39:29 UTC 
Hello,
I can confirm this with OOo m155 under Mandriva 2006. After the export to PDF the second page 
has got an white background instead of the gradient with transparency ... :(
Comment 3 epix 2006-02-05 19:20:47 UTC 
Same behaviour using win2k and xp, no matter which settings defined.
Comment 4 Joost Andrae 2006-02-05 20:26:42 UTC 
JA->PL: please take a look at this. CC'ed you
Comment 5 philipp.lohmann 2006-02-06 10:05:19 UTC 
assign to me, add regression keyword
Comment 6 philipp.lohmann 2006-02-06 10:24:49 UTC 
pl->sj: this broke with 680m153. There were no changes in vcl PDFWriter between
m152 and m153, so i guess this might have something to do with your changes in
impress82. However, i do not understand the exact problem, could you please have
a look ? Do you see any chance to fix this in 2.0.2 timeframe ?
Comment 7 sven.jacobi 2006-02-07 08:59:39 UTC 
accepted
Comment 8 sven.jacobi 2006-02-07 13:54:40 UTC 
sj: this issue has been fixed in cws[ka008]
Comment 9 sven.jacobi 2006-02-07 15:46:52 UTC 
sj: this issue is ready to be verified in cws[ka008]

re-open issue and reassign to wg@openoffice.org
Comment 10 sven.jacobi 2006-02-07 15:46:57 UTC 
reassign to wg@openoffice.org
Comment 11 sven.jacobi 2006-02-07 15:47:01 UTC 
reset resolution to FIXED
Comment 12 wolframgarten 2006-02-08 15:29:13 UTC 
Verified in CWS.
Comment 13 wolframgarten 2006-02-15 15:07:07 UTC 
Tested in master OOB680/m1. Closed.