Issue 64850 - WW8: sequence field not imported as hidden text
Summary: WW8: sequence field not imported as hidden text
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: open-import (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
: 75170 113057 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-04-27 14:45 UTC by grsingleton
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:19 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Example word document that fails to import to 2.0.2 (20.04 KB, application/msword)
2006-04-27 14:46 UTC, grsingleton
no flags Details
How OO 1.1.5 imports the attached doc (191.39 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-04-28 07:19 UTC, michael.ruess
no flags Details
test .doc showing import failure with SEQ field using "\*alphabetic" switch (23.50 KB, application/msword)
2007-06-01 19:33 UTC, lpfp
no flags Details
screenshot of test.doc opened in OO2.0.2. The first of the two SEQ fields is displayed wrongly. (402.34 KB, image/jpeg)
2007-06-01 19:35 UTC, lpfp
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description grsingleton 2006-04-27 14:45:40 UTC
The attached file fails to import correctly in 2.0.2 but opens properly in 1.1.5.
I see this as a serious regression.
Comment 1 grsingleton 2006-04-27 14:46:42 UTC
Created attachment 36111 [details]
Example word document that fails to import to 2.0.2
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2006-04-27 18:27:53 UTC
MRU->FLR: the "sequence" field right at the beginning of the text should be
imported as hidden text; on this way the field switch \h from MS Word could be
interpreted for it.

But it was also the case in OO 1.1.x, so no Regression. Other things look good
IMO. Please describe more precisely if I missed something.
Comment 3 grsingleton 2006-04-27 19:14:09 UTC
NO THIS IS *NOT* THE CASE. 1.1.5 opens the sample document fine. ABIWord and
KWord alos open the test file. ONLY 2.0.2 exhibits this problem and so IT IS A
REGRESSION.  Please take the necessary steps to get this fixed for 2.0.3 as it
is a MAJOR bug.
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2006-04-28 07:19:05 UTC
Created attachment 36127 [details]
How OO 1.1.5 imports the attached doc
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2006-04-28 07:21:03 UTC
See my attachment; it looks the same in OO 1.1.5 and OO 2.0.2.
Also, the fact that it is a regression foes not justify P2 for this. P2 is
reserved for crashes.
Comment 6 grsingleton 2006-04-28 11:43:42 UTC
p3 is okay however;I think that P2 is appropriate according to the definitions:

P2
    P2 marks severe problems which affect a significant number of customers
    Issues with this priority must be fixed before the target release (see
Target milestone), which usually is the next major release, and should be dealt
with as soon as possible.
    Not fixing them for the target release is not acceptable.
Measures/Examples

    * An essential product feature - e.g. Printing - does not work at all, and
no workaround exists
    * User data is corrupted in an easy-to-encounter way;
      e.g. saving a document corrupts the resulting file and renders it unusable
    * Crashs or freezes during normal operations of the application
    * A critical usability problem;
      e.g. a user interface which renders the underlying functionality
incomprehensible for the majority of users
    * Severe performance problems in often-used/basic functionality;
      e.g.
          o every application startup takes 5 minutes
          o saving/loading of usual small-sized document takes several minutes
    * Huge memory leaks in common or easy-to-reach functionality;
      e.g. a mail merge operation which leaks 1 MB per merged document
    * UI responsiveness of a non-essential feature is extremely poor, rendering
the feature unusable;
      e.g. a File/Open dialog which needs 5 minutest to open

This one in particular:

* A critical usability problem;
      e.g. a user interface which renders the underlying functionality
incomprehensible for the majority of users

You might want to reconsider.
Comment 7 michael.ruess 2006-04-28 14:31:46 UTC
No, we won't reconsider the priority.
This problem is of course not critical. The application does not crash nor it
interfers an essential feature.
Also, there exists a VERY easy workaround for it: just press DEL in at the
beginning of the document.
Additionally, it is not a regression as my screenshot shows.
Comment 8 grsingleton 2006-04-28 15:10:10 UTC
Okay. Let me see if I understand. You are syaing this is not a regression. Is
that correct? If yes, then I would like to point out that "A regression is when
the software "relapses to a less perfect or developed state". (American Heritage
Dictionary) This usually means that a feature or function was working in earlier
builds and is now broken. It may also mean that speed or stability has gotten
worse. It's often useful to notice that something is a regression, because it
may point out that a bug "fix" was actually not appropriate or proper." 

Now you have confirmed that 1.1.5 does indeed import the file correctly but that
2.0.2 does not yet you refuse to treat this as a REGRESSION. Why? 
Comment 9 Mathias_Bauer 2006-08-30 14:56:11 UTC
assigned to hbrinkm
Comment 10 michael.ruess 2007-03-07 10:06:08 UTC
*** Issue 75170 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 lpfp 2007-06-01 19:31:33 UTC
I have a similar issue that may be related. When opening documents produced in
Word2000/2003, OO 2.0 loses formatting information for sequence fields ("SEQ"
field in Word). In particular, a SEQ field formatted with the "\*alphabetic"
switch (to be displayed as "a, b, c") gets reset to the default arabic "1, 2,
3"). This seems to happen only if the additional switch "\*MERGEFORMAT" in Word
is activated. Fields created in Word without the mergeformat switch are imported
correctly. Test document (test.doc) and OpenOffice screenshot showing the error
attached.
Comment 12 lpfp 2007-06-01 19:33:26 UTC
Created attachment 45593 [details]
test .doc showing import failure with SEQ field using "\*alphabetic" switch
Comment 13 lpfp 2007-06-01 19:35:37 UTC
Created attachment 45594 [details]
screenshot of test.doc opened in OO2.0.2. The first of the two SEQ fields is displayed wrongly.
Comment 14 eric.savary 2010-07-09 18:46:30 UTC
*** Issue 113057 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:19:44 UTC
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".