Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 652
Message not send to subscriber
Last modified: 2007-09-23 15:38:46 UTC
message http://www.openoffice.org/www-releases/msg00342.html was sent by Martin Hollmichel as a news postings to releases@ooo. It was received and archived, but didn't make it to the subscriber openoffice-releases@staroffice-news.germany.sun.com. Log Entries for the outgoing mail: Apr 4 14:36:25 staroffice-news sendmail[6077]: OAA06077: from=news, size=1272, class=0, pri=31272, nrcpts=1, msgid=<20010404.12362758@p0i8f5.Germany.Sun.COM>, relay=news@localhost Apr 4 14:36:25 staroffice-news sendmail[6079]: OAA06077: to=releases@openoffice.org, ctladdr=news (9/13), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=smtp, stat=Sent (OAA20589 Message accepted for delivery)
Please have a look at your logfiles before they are expired...
I'm looking at the logs now. There are entries which look problematic; I'm doing research right now. Unfortunately, I don't know if there will be sufficient information to resurrect dead messages.
Taking issue
emailing edk for status report
What happened is this : transient problems with lack of system resources started on Mar 30th. This seemed to be caused by problems with the tunnel connections (Niels has some ideas as to what needs to be fixed on the Sun side) ... anyway, the problem gradually got worse until Apr 5th, when it was resolved. We're now watching more carefully for it. A significant number of outgoing messages were dropped during this period; generally subscribers to mailing lists got a message from ezmlm about how one or more messages from the resp mailing lists had bounced. I believe there is no way to recreate those messages, unfortunately; but this shouldn't happen again. In addition to watching for tunnel processes hanging around, I'm looking into changing qmail so that -- should this sort of thing happen again -- it'd attempt retry, instead of dying with a complain about how qmail-remote was unable to run.
Ed, What needs to happen so that we can close this issue? Also, since you say the problem was resolved Apr 5, does that mean that a) this issue is resolved b) this issue is not resolved, but is no longer a P2 c) this issues is resolved, but we should create another issue for the changes in qmail that you mention Or something else?
Issue resolved, per edk
I close this issue