Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 65976
[PATCH] do not add compiler default include/library path
Last modified: 2017-05-20 10:47:29 UTC
... do not accidently catch misplaced header files or libraries. Besides of this it is just useless to add these. That piece of configure could be cleaned up, maybe. But I am not sure so I do it this way for now. Patch is on URL.
reassign for review and commit, looks ok from my side.
right
committed to cws configure18
verified
seen in m179. closing.
This issue broke the xinerama check in configure, reverted. So we need a proper fix.
Move target to 2.1.
What is the status of this issue, please? Time to close it and create new one for the xinerama proble should there be any?
pjanik: no
uh, sorry, oversaw something.... pjanik: yes. (No extra issue needed, apparently)
close
reopen
Created attachment 46938 [details] kill xinc/xlib defaults; xinerama hack
Is there any reason to link to static xinerama library for linux/freebsd nowadays? Mac OS X supports dynamic version only. Would be nice to simplify for linux/freebsd, too. ;)
Created attachment 47047 [details] XINC/XLIB defaults; xinerama resets XLIB
Second patch still sets XINC and XLIB to 'default_x_*'. The Xinerama check resets XLIB later which does not change the build time XINC and XLIB variables. This, at least, should suffice to fix your configure error for Xinerama, Rene. And it should fix some strange include errors on Gentoo AMD64 multilib systems. Another thing I wonder about: There is a 'AC_CHECK_LIB(Xinerama, XineramaIsActive, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR(Xinerama not functional?)], [$XINERAMA_EXTRA_LIBS])' check. If you chose static linking and you happen to have a dynamic version, too, it will check the dynamic version instead, won't it? :)
Is there any news to this? Latest patch available here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ooo-build/ooo-build/tree/patches/dev300/config_office-XINC-XLIB-defaults.diff
I'm adding this comment to all open issues with Issue Type == PATCH. We have 220 such issues, many of them quite old. I apologize for that. We need your help in prioritizing which patches should be integrated into our next release, Apache OpenOffice 4.0. If you have submitted a patch and think it is applicable for AOO 4.0, please respond with a comment to let us know. On the other hand, if the patch is no longer relevant, please let us know that as well. If you have any general questions or want to discuss this further, please send a note to our dev mailing list: dev@openoffice.apache.org Thanks! -Rob
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".