Issue 67578 - Documenting the new PDF Encryption feature
Summary: Documenting the new PDF Encryption feature
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: documentation
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Online help (show other issues)
Version: 680m177
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.3
Assignee: Uwe Fischer
QA Contact: issues@documentation
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-19 16:44 UTC by Giuseppe Castagno (aka beppec56)
Modified: 2007-05-25 09:16 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
the first version od the documentation draft (67.78 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2006-07-19 16:45 UTC, Giuseppe Castagno (aka beppec56)
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Giuseppe Castagno (aka beppec56) 2006-07-19 16:44:14 UTC
As I said in a mail exchange (see ) I opened a documentation issue for the new
PDF Encryption feature.
I'm not a technical writer so the document I'm going to attach is surely not
well suited to be included "as is" in a manual, guide or on-line help. But I
think it's enough for a start.
I set the version as m177 because this is the first available with this feature.
Comment 1 Giuseppe Castagno (aka beppec56) 2006-07-19 16:45:24 UTC
Created attachment 37895 [details]
the first version od the documentation draft
Comment 2 Giuseppe Castagno (aka beppec56) 2006-07-19 16:49:49 UTC
Oops I forgot the link to the mail which triggered this, here it is:
http://documentation.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=dev&by=thread&from=1391066
The delay (almost two months) depends on the fact that the specification became
stable on July, 7th.
Comment 3 grsingleton 2006-07-19 16:50:18 UTC
Please let me know the thread of the dicussion. I have missed it.
Comment 4 grsingleton 2006-07-19 16:56:57 UTC
Got it. Thanks but now have questions:
1.  Do you mean public key as in a certificate? Or are we limited to say gpg keys.
2.  How does this affect digital signing?
Comment 5 Giuseppe Castagno (aka beppec56) 2006-07-19 17:17:15 UTC
-> grsingleton. It seems I forgot to add the line numbering to the draft, i
would have been better. So please turn it on on the draft document, thanks.

> 1.  Do you mean public key as in a certificate? Or are we limited to say gpg keys.

I suppose you are referring to row 19 of the draft. There I meant the kind of
the security that a PDF can support, but it is not supported here. Only the
Security handler (row 18 and from row 28) is supported.

> 2.  How does this affect digital signing?

If you are referring to export a digital signature to a PDF document (issue
47895 may be ?), it was not implemented in issue 12626 (the one I'm referring
to, again I forgot to mention it at the very beginning, sorry...).
As to digitally sign a PDF with an external application, for example Adobe
Acrobat Professional, I think it will check the permission if signing is permitted.
Comment 6 grsingleton 2006-07-19 17:32:14 UTC
I asked because I have a code-signing certificate and saw that its use might be
useful. I will be getting m177 or later soonest and will experiment.
Comment 7 Uwe Fischer 2006-07-20 13:14:12 UTC
info will be added to file /shared/01/ref_pdf_export.xhp once the CWS hcshared01
is integrated. Must wait for this because the other new tab pages are explained
there, too.
Comment 8 Uwe Fischer 2006-08-10 10:49:38 UTC
changed target
Comment 9 grsingleton 2006-08-10 13:53:44 UTC
Question. Why change the target. I have been testing this feature and have
documented it based on the original target. As near as I can tell it is still
part of the devel snapshots as I have m180 working well. Is this change becasue
of some new numbering scheme?
Comment 10 Uwe Fischer 2006-08-10 14:17:44 UTC
sorry, I've hijacked this "manual" issue to serve as an "online help" issue too.
Nothing to be worried about. Change target back if you need to.
Comment 11 grsingleton 2006-08-10 14:29:40 UTC
I would rather know about the numbering. Quite a jump from 2.0.4 to 2.1. If this
is a new development from thje developers then why not jump directly to 2.5 so
it matches Sun's numbering?
Comment 12 Uwe Fischer 2006-08-16 15:05:10 UTC
please verify in hcshared04. Open Writer doc, choose File - Export as PDF. Enter
a file name and click Save. PDF dialog opens, click Security tab page. Press
Shift+F1 and check all controls have Extended Help. 
Comment 13 frank 2006-09-05 09:36:35 UTC
take it
Comment 14 frank 2006-09-08 07:25:52 UTC
found fixed on cws hcshared04
Comment 15 Uwe Fischer 2006-11-06 09:06:50 UTC
had to replace the source file by an older version due to some build problems in
master.
Fix is now part of CWS hcshared06.
Comment 16 Uwe Fischer 2006-11-08 14:59:24 UTC
was verified by QA in hcshared04, I can verify fix in hcshared06. Leave as
"verified".
Comment 17 frank 2006-11-17 14:53:39 UTC
in addition to my latest comment :

also in hcshared06

Frank
Comment 18 frank 2007-04-27 14:53:09 UTC
Re-opened because on OOF tree this does not work whilst SRC680_m209 is fine.
Comment 19 frank 2007-04-27 14:55:26 UTC
Uwe please check if it should go into 2.2.1and set target according to the
decission.
Comment 20 Uwe Fischer 2007-04-27 15:26:01 UTC
Fix will be integrated to 2.3 automatically. There had been some resync problems
with this file which delayed the timely merging to master. It is OK starting
with master m203.
See issue 58070
Comment 21 grsingleton 2007-04-27 15:43:57 UTC
FYI, this feature has been included in the user guide,
http://documentation.openoffice.org/manuals/OOo2.x/user_guide2_draft.pdf
since 2006-07-31. Samples were provided at that time.
Comment 22 Uwe Fischer 2007-05-24 11:35:45 UTC
This is reported by fst to be verified in m209
Comment 23 Uwe Fischer 2007-05-25 09:16:49 UTC
found fixed in master m213 --> closing