Issue 68049 - please extend site-search to index *.xhtml files as well as regular *.html
Summary: please extend site-search to index *.xhtml files as well as regular *.html
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Website general issues (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-01 17:02 UTC by lohmaier
Modified: 2009-07-12 18:25 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lohmaier 2006-08-01 17:02:54 UTC
api.openoffice.org generates files ending in .xhtml for the documentation (see
e.g. http://api.openoffice.org/docs/DevelopersGuide/DevelopersGuide.xhtml ), but
unfortunately *.xhtml files are not indexed.

Please add *.xhtml to the list of extension to be indexed

Since the contents is nothing else than the other .html documents, I don't
expect any problems.
Comment 1 lsuarezpotts 2006-08-01 17:05:11 UTC
I see only goodness out of this, provided that indexing .xhtml files will not slow the server down too 
much.

Reassigning to support.

MH, ST, any objections?

Louis
Comment 2 lsuarezpotts 2006-08-01 17:06:01 UTC
Calling this RFE; no pcn associated yet.
Comment 3 lsuarezpotts 2006-08-04 03:08:32 UTC
support, would you be so kind as to assign an RFE for this? 

thanks!

Louis
Comment 4 Unknown 2006-10-10 12:00:04 UTC
Good one i like this request . Putting forward as a PCN issue for the Product
Management .
Comment 5 Unknown 2006-10-10 12:21:51 UTC
Updating whiteboard.
Comment 6 Unknown 2009-01-28 12:02:59 UTC
I am awaiting the validation response from the internal team on its
implementation in CEE 5.3.
Comment 7 jsc 2009-01-28 12:10:08 UTC
it's too late for my initial request because we have moved the DevGuide into the
wiki. I don't need it anymore but forgot to close this issue.
Comment 8 Unknown 2009-01-28 12:33:02 UTC
Then marking this as invalid
Comment 9 Mechtilde 2009-07-12 18:25:31 UTC
invalid -> closed