Issue 69861 - XBookmarkInsertTool never implemented
Summary: XBookmarkInsertTool never implemented
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: App Dev
Classification: Unclassified
Component: api (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: issues@documentation
QA Contact: issues@api
URL: http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-26 08:22 UTC by knobo
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:08 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description knobo 2006-09-26 08:22:57 UTC 
As far as I can see, the XBookmarkInsertTool is never implemented. People can be
fooled to think that it should be possible to use this function. Until it is
implemented, it should be removed from the documentation

I chose Priority P3 as I consider the IDL documentation for part of the
spesification.
Comment 1 grsingleton 2006-09-26 13:06:59 UTC 
added myself to cc list
Comment 2 Mathias_Bauer 2006-09-28 11:25:51 UTC 
Sorry, but that isn't a bug. Interfaces are valid even if they aren't
implemented in OOo. And if an interface is part of the API it also must be
documented. Moreover, as this is a published interface removing it would be
incompatible and thus forbidden.

BTW: some interfaces are even only there to become implemented by external
components, not by any OOo code.
Comment 3 knobo 2006-09-28 11:31:56 UTC 
Could the fackt that it's not inplemented be documented?
Comment 4 Mathias_Bauer 2006-09-28 11:47:42 UTC 
This doesn't make sense as this information is expected to change and so can be
outdated permanently. And of course it does never make sense in the IDL
documentation.

Sorry, but I don't see a useful way to deal with information like that.
Comment 5 grsingleton 2006-10-26 14:00:17 UTC 
changed component myself since G. Roderick Singleton wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:31 +0200, Stephan Wunderlich wrote:
>> Hi Knut,
>> 
>> > Ok, thanx. I'll make shure to file issues. There is a lot of them..  
>> > Starting
>> > with:  69861 <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi? 
>> > id=69861> and
>> > 69863 <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69863>
>> 
>> That is great :-) ... As you already pointed out a good documentation  
>> is crucial if external developers should be attracted to program for  
>> OOo.
>> So every step to make it better is one in the right direction :-)
>> 
> 
> I agree. One problem though, the documentation project does not have the
> source documents so it is unlikely that the documents in the issues will
> ever be updated. Perhaps the component on the issues is wrong.

I will take care that the issues get the right assignments.

Best regards,
Mathias

did not
Comment 6 Mathias_Bauer 2006-10-30 12:48:58 UTC 
Well, as this issue was rejected anyway we didn't need to reassign it. :-)
By I forgot to close it, sorry.