Issue 7043 - Locale for Slovak (sk) language
Summary: Locale for Slovak (sk) language
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: Internationalization
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: ooo
QA Contact: issues@l10n
URL: http://files.juraj.bednar.sk/sk_SK.xml
Keywords:
Depends on: 12209
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2002-08-16 16:24 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:00 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2002-08-16 16:24:10 UTC 
There was no locale file for Slovak (sk) language.
I've done this one, it's been fully tested in my local
build of openoffice.org 1.0.1. I'm also sending the
new copyright paper today (I'm not a contributor now).
Please let me know, if I have to change something before
you add it. You can find the locale file in URL above.
Comment 1 Dieter.Loeschky 2002-08-27 09:04:13 UTC 
DL->Juraj: Hi Juraj, we need your copyright assignment first.
Comment 2 Unknown 2002-10-04 22:16:41 UTC 
I hope my copyright assigment already arrived and this can be commited to 
the tree.
Comment 3 pavel 2003-03-07 11:43:39 UTC 
Could this be possible added to 1.1 after beta?
Comment 4 Dieter.Loeschky 2003-03-12 14:43:12 UTC 
DL->ER: We received the copyright assignment. Would you please takeover?
Comment 5 ooo 2003-03-14 19:46:59 UTC 
accept issue
Comment 6 ooo 2003-03-31 13:07:15 UTC 
The URL http://files.juraj.bednar.sk/sk_SK.xml just results in a 404
file not found. Please attach the file to this issue.
Comment 7 pavel 2003-03-31 14:41:03 UTC 
This is a duplicate of 12209.
cs_CZ and sk_SK locale files will be provided there.
Comment 8 ooo 2003-03-31 15:16:25 UTC 
oops, yep, they're essentially the same and I already commented on
that.. ok, we'll track it under issue 12209 then.
Btw: there exists a separate "resolve as duplicate of ..." field for
such circumstances.