Issue 76005 - X-No-Archive headers
Summary: X-No-Archive headers
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Mailing lists (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: CEE Rubicon
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-04-01 22:16 UTC by lsuarezpotts
Modified: 2021-05-27 19:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lsuarezpotts 2007-04-01 22:16:21 UTC 
User hank_leininger pointed out that,
--

We carried a number of OpenOffice lists for a long time, since I think
mid-2002.  Our database inserter script automatically skips adding any
mails with the X-No-Archive: yes header set.

It looks like in mid-2005, something (list server or management software
change maybe?) caused "X-No-Archive: Yes" headers to be added to every
message going through the lists.  Some mailing list management software
(such as ezmlm) defaults to adding them to every email.  This is
unfortunate, as it makes it impossible to tell the difference between
mails that the original poster really went out of their way to request
their mails not be archived, or any regular list message that had the
header added by the server.

Is it intentional that the list server adds these headers?  If not,
would it be possible to modify the configs so that they do not?  I would
then re-insert the intervening mails, to catch up our archives.


--

My belief is that we want OOo lists to be archived.  But it would seem as if
archiving would be accomplished no matter what.  

Support, would it be possible to evaluate altering the behavior? and what would
be the consequences?  As well, does the move to 4.5.x affect this particular
behavior?

thanks
louis
Comment 1 Unknown 2007-04-02 02:19:37 UTC 
Thank you for contacting CollabNet Customer Support. Based on the information
that has been provided to us, we will initiate our research & provide you an
update as soon as we have adequate information.

Regards,
Sindhu
Support Operations.
Comment 2 Unknown 2007-04-18 10:32:35 UTC 
In the Discussion Forum a facility has been provided by which we can add custom
Header Format's for a specific mailing list .

Moving this issue to the resolved later .
Comment 3 Unknown 2007-09-19 10:23:44 UTC 
Updating the issue with the appropriate milestone .
Comment 4 Unknown 2008-02-25 10:52:44 UTC 
Hi

This feature is fixed in Rubicon and I have verified the same on a test box
carrying the latest version. I shall close this case for now. Please feel free
to re-open, if the functionality does not satisfy your expectation when site
gets upgraded to Rubicon version of CEE.

Regards,
Vathsan
Support Operations.
Comment 5 Unknown 2008-02-26 20:53:04 UTC 
Re-opening the issue.
Comment 6 Unknown 2008-02-26 20:53:35 UTC 
Marking the issue as Resolved LATER.
Comment 7 Unknown 2009-01-23 10:39:33 UTC 
CollabNet Support is currently reviewing the issues under Resolved-Later. If the
issues are fixed currently in any of the present CEE releases, then it will be
marked as Resolved-Fixed.

There might be a few issues which might not be in our future roadmap which might
be closed as Wontfix unless it does not lie under any custom request.
Comment 8 Unknown 2009-01-23 10:40:07 UTC 
This is fixed in CEE 5.0, hence marking as fixed