Issue 84832 - WW8: modify date imported as empty field
Summary: WW8: modify date imported as empty field
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: viewing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.3.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-12-21 13:32 UTC by gregorystec
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Example file with embedded data type macro. (107.00 KB, text/plain)
2007-12-21 13:35 UTC, gregorystec
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description gregorystec 2007-12-21 13:32:01 UTC
The Writer wrong parses the inserted "date" object i MS Ofiice .doc docunent.
The data displayed in Writer is deferent then in MS Word.
Comment 1 gregorystec 2007-12-21 13:35:19 UTC
Created attachment 50533 [details]
Example file with embedded data type macro.
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2008-01-02 11:34:21 UTC
Same root cause as issue 66570.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 66570 ***
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2008-01-02 11:37:08 UTC
Closing duplicate.
Comment 4 gregorystec 2008-01-04 22:55:09 UTC
Sorry, but it is not not case of exporting to .doc. The case is if open .doc. If
you open this document (natively created with the MS Word), the date macros
incorrectly displays dates. I this that that is better to resolve some of
problems, especially with import issue than mark them as duplicate to unresolved
issue. How you think to offer OOo for MS replacement if so simple issue are from
practically began unresolved. If you have 15 year old repository of document and
so simple macro do not work correctly. You must stay with and invest in MS
(Office 2007), again. 
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2008-01-07 09:39:29 UTC
MRU->HBRINKM: see attached document, the "modify date" field at the top of the
table is shown as empty field, though the document property shows a valid value.
Comment 6 Mathias_Bauer 2008-04-07 13:07:16 UTC
Looks as this fixed in OOo 2.4.
Comment 7 Mathias_Bauer 2008-04-07 13:09:38 UTC
Sorry, not 2.4: in 3.0 Beta. I tested dev300 m2.
Please verify.
Comment 8 michael.ruess 2008-07-10 14:23:48 UTC
Yes, works fine in OO 3.0, checked with DEV300m24, but should also work in older
3.0 snapshots / beta builds.