Issue 91677 - My brilliant idea - One file format - with ALL of the functions in it
Summary: My brilliant idea - One file format - with ALL of the functions in it
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: AOO Later
Assignee: eric.savary
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-15 17:55 UTC by dogzdik
Modified: 2008-11-24 10:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description dogzdik 2008-07-15 17:55:51 UTC
My brilliant idea, that I had, will revolutionise everything - completely.

Well the other night I was doing a drawing in DRAW, and I had to insert
a table...

But there was NO table production function, in the Draw program.

Soooo I thought "Well it's not such a big deal to do a table in Write
and then copy and paste it into Draw...

And then I went that one step further....

a) The seperate "file types" for separate functions, really is sourced
into ancient history - such as *.bat for batch files, *.exe for
executable files etc...

b) And especially in todays world, doing clear demarkation in
"packages", is a bit like doing a video.... We have CGI effects
(Computer Graphic Animation), we have the hard recorded video it's self,
we have audio recording, importing and mixing, and we have a heap of
editing tools....


What I'd like to see is to get rid of all the separate file and process
types, and have the ONE program - with the ONE file type, with all the
functions in it.

It would be so good to do a big drawing, to have an area for text laid
out in it, like a document, to have spreadsheet calculations and graphs
of the results....

And if I want to do it as a presentation.... I could save it with the
encoding in it, to flip the pages at different time intervals with extra
text etc.

Or if I wanted to print it out as an A3 document, or produce A2 or A1
drawings, then I wouldn't have to face the restrictions of developing
on, and printing to different paper sizes, as set by people who create
the different programs.....


In terms of convenience and sanity, I can see a lot of GOOD REASONS for
going with the ONE universal file type, and I can also see many GOOD
REASONS for getting rid of the old demarkation of process's.


I really like the idea of having a single file type, with a single
extension, such as *.ooo; that gives me all functions, available on all paper
sizes, and *_/everything/_* "just opens" and runs within the one program...


I guess it's like getting a car serviced, sure I can book it in and take it to
the Auto-Elecricians, then I can book it in and take it to the tyre place, and
then I can book it in and take it to the car detailers, and then
I can book it in and take it to the crash repairs to get a few dings knocked
out, and then I can book it in and take it to the mechanics....

Or I can simply drive it to the SERVICE CENTER, and get the whole lot done at
the one time, at the one place......

This is where I feel that modern practices have to take the Open Office
software, too.

As far as the car goes, I don't want to be contacting all these different
places, to be making appointments and to be dropping it off at all these
different places in all sorts of locations...

I want the same idea's eliminated from the Open OIffice program, so that I can
have ALL the functions, available to me, at all time, in every piece of work I
produce - without limitation or restriction.

I don't want to be unable to produce tables in a drawing document, or to have
very limited drawing functions in a text document, and I don't want to be
restricted to paper sizes for different formats.....

This demarkation, of limitations and restrictions of functions and facilities is
utterly stupid.


While in the text function, I may want tables and diagrams and sundry to be
included, but the paper size I may want, is A0, but I can't access that -
because the text program is designed to restrict that functionality....

But the commercial printer down the road, can print it out on A0 - for me.....

And all the other restrictions and limitations - What you can do well in Text -
you can't do very much of in Drawing, Spreadsheets or Presentations, and what
you can do well in Drawing, you can't well in Text, Presentations or Spreadsheets...

I see that the next step in the evolution of this product - the office suite, is
to remove the "limited multifunction's" approach and to step into a universal
full functionality approach.

I really want the universal full functionality - of all the programs, written
into the ONE program.


Cheers


Shane
Comment 1 Martin Hollmichel 2008-07-16 12:58:06 UTC
change component and adjust Prio
Comment 2 Uwe Fischer 2008-07-16 15:15:25 UTC
Why not discuss your idea at the mailing list? 
http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html
You'll get much more attention there.
General discussion like this: discuss@openoffice.org
If you already have an exact idea HOW to develop this idea in terms of program
code, you may want to discuss it on the developer list.
dev@openoffice.org 
Comment 3 dogzdik 2008-07-17 15:24:25 UTC
This is the best idea I have ever seen. 

Removing the "a few drawing functions in Write", and removing "a few writing
functions" in Draw.. etc., 

All functions in ONE program, for ONE file type = much better.
Comment 4 dogzdik 2008-07-17 15:28:54 UTC
This is neccessacary.
Comment 5 eric.savary 2008-08-05 17:09:22 UTC
Changed target
Comment 6 eric.savary 2008-11-24 10:42:56 UTC
This is a brilliant idea idea just because it's yours? Wow!

Before we start redesign from scratch the whole OOo, we have thousands of other
features that really *need* to be implemented.

As UFI said, first discuss this in dedicated board, for example:
discuss@ux.openoffice.org

And please have a look at:
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/why_all_issues_are_equal
it explains as watermark what to do to have a chance to get one's feature
implemented.

This one sound pretty unrealistic.
Comment 7 eric.savary 2008-11-24 10:43:30 UTC
.
Comment 8 eric.savary 2008-11-24 10:43:42 UTC
Closed