Issue 98610 - Font history not visible anymore - regression
Summary: Font history not visible anymore - regression
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 3.0.1
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: stefan.baltzer
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: regression
: 100295 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-29 14:37 UTC by jgreenow
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description jgreenow 2009-01-29 14:37:26 UTC
The Font Name drop down list is no longer preceded by a list of the most
recently used fonts. This does not appear to be related to the setting in Tools
- Options - OpenOffice.org - View - Show font history. This feature worked in 2.0.0
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2009-01-30 12:58:51 UTC
MRU->HDU: the font history is not visible anymore. It is stored, though, and
possible to be reached secretly via cursor keys.
Comment 2 hdu@apache.org 2009-01-30 16:14:17 UTC
@pl: The ImplListBoxWindow::ImplEntryType::mnHeight is zero for these MRU entries. You suggested that 
this regression may have been introduced with the changes for multi-line-listbox entries in CWS 
ooo301gsl4, which got into OOO300_m15. Confirming that OOO300_m14 didn't have this problem yet. 
Reassigning.
Comment 3 philipp.lohmann 2009-01-30 16:28:33 UTC
What I actually said was that the changes came in with ooo301gsl3 with the
multiline listbox entries. Darn.
Comment 4 philipp.lohmann 2009-02-02 13:02:00 UTC
fixed in CWS ooo31gsl1
Comment 5 philipp.lohmann 2009-02-05 15:27:56 UTC
please verify in CWS ooo31gsl1
Comment 6 stefan.baltzer 2009-02-10 09:18:54 UTC
Verified in CWS ooo31gsl1
Comment 7 stefan.baltzer 2009-03-11 19:12:04 UTC
OK in OOO310_m5. Closed.
Comment 8 michael.ruess 2009-03-18 07:35:25 UTC
*** Issue 100295 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***