This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
NOTE - this is not about translating samples; they are not translated; this is about other i18n aspects part of this is related to new project encoding property and part is related to encoding handling for generating javadoc assumption here is that it is ok for user to change some labels or other ui items part of using the sample. And it might be that the created project might have multibyte in it anyway if project name has multibyte in it and thats used as name of package or class, or that date is part of the temate and so would have mbyte characters in it. (this is legal in nb and java) 0. this is for the visualweb sample projects - the default case now for nb projects now (new implementation for nb6) is that utf-8 encoding is used but if encoding was changed in another project, that encoding becomes the global encoding value. 1. for other nb samples that had not been regenerated, when multibyte is added to some label and thus its then in the java code, when compiling the project or when generating javadoc, some warnings about encoding are shown but the project and javadoc compiles ok. 2. the fix for javadoc has been filed for various project types; the fix relates to javadoc.encoding property defined in the project.properties wasn't used only defined. 3. the regeneration of the sample projects for nb6 could help with these warning since the build-impl.xml will also be regenerated. Tomas can provide more information on these topics. 4. Also, if these samples might have jsp or html files in them and the encoding value used in creation of these files is different than in past, and works with the new project encoding, so regeneration of the samples might help those files in the samples to be compatible with that. 5. NOTE - however 108682 is not yet fixed for visualweb in general (seeding the jsp files with project encoding - this might cause separate problems for both samples and non samples; suggest this issue be fixed soon.
this was already filed as 113372; I think some button in IZ might have been incorrectly pushed so that this was filed again as a new issue. ken.frank@sun.com *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 113372 ***