This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Some commands work (diff) but most don't (log, commit...) This is perhaps the same problem as described in bug #11547. System is NT 4 (cvs server on HP-UX). cvs.exe client on NT is version 1.9 Here is the error: Command Log failed. Check the full output of the command on the Runtime tab in Explorer. The error output follows: cvs [server aborted]: no such directory `com/profor/sapex/saxdb/gui' Also I have the following exception: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.netbeans.modules.vcscore.commands.CommandOutputPanel$1.run(CommandOutputPane l.java:311) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:154) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:317) [catch] at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEvent(EventDispatchThread.java:103) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:93) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:84) Here are some CVS admin files: Entries: /Machine.java/1.20/Wed Oct 11 09:10:19 2000// /Material.java/1.21/Wed Oct 11 09:10:19 2000// /Messages.java/1.9/Wed Nov 29 09:40:17 2000// Repository: /users/cni/cvsroot/saxdb/dev/api/com/profor/sapex/saxdb Root: :pserver:pg@aneto:/users/cni/cvsroot Also note that there are no spaces in the paths.
> This is perhaps the same problem as described in bug #11547. Does it mean, that you use cvs from CygWin distribution ? Or a native Windows executable ? If you use cvs from CygWin, can you please try cvs.exe for Windows from www.cvshome.org ? (We recommend 1.11 or 1.11.1p1 version) Thanks.
You're right. I've tried with cvs.exe from cvshome.org and now it seems to work. Before that, we used a cvs.exe built from FSF source code, version 1.9, and it had always worked until NB 3.2. Perhaps you use parameters that don't exist in cvs 1.9? The supported cvs version should be noted somewhere. Thanks!
Resolving as INVALID. Anyway you are right that this information should be provided as it is in Release Notes file of Forte for Java. I'll try to mention it next time.
Yes, I agree with myself, it is really invalid. Verified.