This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 154436 - NullPointerException at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicComboBoxUI.isFocusTraversable
Summary: NullPointerException at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicComboBoxUI.isFocusTravers...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 154133
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@platform
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-12-03 10:24 UTC by Petr Chytil
Modified: 2009-02-19 22:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 143667


Attachments
stacktrace (2.62 KB, text/plain)
2008-12-03 10:24 UTC, Petr Chytil
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petr Chytil 2008-12-03 10:24:07 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200812030201)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 1.5.0_16-133, Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition, 1.5.0_16-b06-284
OS: Mac OS X, 10.5.5, i386

User Comments:
pchytil: toolbar dnd



Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicComboBoxUI.isFocusTraversable(BasicComboBoxUI.java:834)
        at javax.swing.LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy.accept(LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy.java:218)
        at javax.swing.SortingFocusTraversalPolicy.getFirstComponent(SortingFocusTraversalPolicy.java:444)
        at javax.swing.LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy.getFirstComponent(LayoutFocusTraversalPolicy.java:148)
        at javax.swing.SortingFocusTraversalPolicy.getDefaultComponent(SortingFocusTraversalPolicy.java:511)
        at java.awt.FocusTraversalPolicy.getInitialComponent(FocusTraversalPolicy.java:149)
Comment 1 Petr Chytil 2008-12-03 10:24:12 UTC
Created attachment 74464 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Stanislav Aubrecht 2009-02-05 12:08:22 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 154133 ***