This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 18447 - Bundle Supported W3C's Recommendations
Summary: Bundle Supported W3C's Recommendations
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Help System (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Havlin
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 32048
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2001-12-07 12:59 UTC by _ lkramolis
Modified: 2013-09-04 12:10 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ lkramolis 2001-12-07 12:59:16 UTC 
Could be used with some javahelp or anything else.
Comment 1 _ pkuzel 2002-06-03 12:27:07 UTC 
Let these are considered while planning next release.
Comment 2 Marek Grummich 2002-07-19 16:51:42 UTC 
Target milestone was changed from not determined to TBD
Comment 3 _ pkuzel 2003-03-26 18:11:00 UTC 
Know LFIs:

1032 XMLSchema part 1
1033 XMLSchema part 2
1051 XML
1052 XSLT
1053 XPath
1257 XHTML
Comment 4 _ pkuzel 2003-09-03 11:11:02 UTC 
Unscheduling from my todo list. New owner is gladly welcome. Meanwhile assigning
to abstract issues@xml.netbeans.org owner.
Comment 5 tk_fhd_aui 2006-03-19 17:49:43 UTC 
I would be interested in taking this issue, if someone would give me some hints with managing this.

Just to agree on the "job" ... The job would be to take all recommendation HTML ZIPs from w3.org, request 
an LFI for them and put them all into an own project. Right?

Regards
     Torsten
Comment 6 Irina Filippova 2010-02-16 11:42:25 UTC 
Not really sure what component this issue belongs to and whether it is still valid.. Reassigning for evaluation to Help System under Platform.
Comment 7 Jaroslav Havlin 2013-09-04 12:10:59 UTC 
(In reply to Irina Filippova from comment #6)
> Not really sure [...] whether it is still valid...
Probably not. Closing this issue.