This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 31058 - Arch questions for autoupdate
Summary: Arch questions for autoupdate
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Autoupdate (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Petr Hrebejk
URL:
Keywords: ARCH
Depends on: 32077 32085
Blocks: 30370
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2003-02-14 11:08 UTC by Jaroslav Tulach
Modified: 2003-04-17 17:43 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: TASK
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaroslav Tulach 2003-02-14 11:08:04 UTC 
Describe input/output architecture by answering
NetBeans Arch Questions as described at

http://openide.netbeans.org/tutorial/api.html
Comment 1 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-02-14 11:39:46 UTC 
Few comments to initial version of these answers:

1. depends on openide and guess also on core. Use <api> tag, for that
please. Also somehow sort external/internal APIs: XML API is external,
FileSystems internal

2. deploy-jar: please mention the location of updater.jar

3. Broken link in compat-standards

4. resources-file: Please describe how it uses the Files, locations it
access, etc. Or point to a documentation for that feature. For example
I know there there is a directory that one can put NBM files and start
NetBeans and these will be installed. That is an api (so use the <api>
tag).

5. resources-read: Please use <api> and describe or point to doc what
should be installed and where.

6. exec-property: <property> tag please.

7. Could you please link to src of classes that you mention in the
document?
Comment 2 Petr Hrebejk 2003-02-14 12:00:42 UTC 
autoupdate/arch/arch-autoupdate.xml
Comment 3 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-02-14 13:36:29 UTC 
Thanks, no doubt that this version is an improvement. But I would
still like to see answers to my above comments: 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7.

Please make sure that you address these issues prior to closing this
bug next time. I do not have enough resources to verify everything
each time. Thanks.
Comment 4 Petr Hrebejk 2003-04-17 17:43:46 UTC 
.