This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 60634 - Way too many threads checking CVS status
Summary: Way too many threads checking CVS status
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 59757
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: vcscore (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Maros Sandor
URL:
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-29 16:36 UTC by _ tboudreau
Modified: 2005-09-05 09:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Thread dump - note the *incredible* number of RP threads! (2.67 KB, text/plain)
2005-06-29 16:43 UTC, _ tboudreau
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ tboudreau 2005-06-29 16:36:36 UTC
The IDE's performance was extremely slow - 3 minutes to expand the Modules node in options to shut 
off the CVS module, 2 minutes to expand a folder with about 15 subfolders in explorer.  The attached 
thread dump shows that there are 18 request processor threads all trying to do CVS access at the same 
time, many blocked trying to write into the same HashMap (suggestion:  don't use a synchronized 
HashMap, build your map privately and only synchronize to merge it with a master map when the 
thread's work is done - but the real problem is *way* too many threads doing this - one would 
probably be enough).
Comment 1 _ tboudreau 2005-06-29 16:43:17 UTC
Created attachment 22957 [details]
Thread dump - note the *incredible* number of RP threads!
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2005-07-12 03:00:04 UTC
Probable dupe of issue #60813?

I have had the same problem using the cvslite currently available from AU. I
have had to turn it off for now since it makes the IDE unusable.
Comment 3 Maros Sandor 2005-07-12 08:55:14 UTC
Updated module will be available next week from AUC.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 59757 ***
Comment 4 Peter Pis 2005-07-12 19:27:58 UTC
Verified.