This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 68341 - [50cat] StackOverflowException after restart of the IDE
Summary: [50cat] StackOverflowException after restart of the IDE
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 68318
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: PC Windows ME/2000
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Tulach
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-09 09:45 UTC by cbulcu
Modified: 2008-12-22 22:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
log file (407.60 KB, text/plain)
2005-11-09 13:16 UTC, cbulcu
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description cbulcu 2005-11-09 09:45:32 UTC
[ JDK VERSION : 1.5.0_05 ]

StackOverflowException on restarting NB, the Beta 2 candidate.





java.lang.StackOverflowError
	at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.poll(ReferenceQueue.java:82)
	at org.openide.util.WeakSet.checkRefQueue(WeakSet.java:276)
	at org.openide.util.WeakSet.object2Entry(WeakSet.java:309)
	at org.openide.util.WeakSet.add(WeakSet.java:111)
	at org.openide.util.lookup.MetaInfServicesLookup.beforeLookup(MetaInfServicesLookup.java:82)
Comment 1 Marian Mirilovic 2005-11-09 10:34:04 UTC
Another P1, dup of issue 68318 ?
Comment 2 Jaroslav Tulach 2005-11-09 13:05:09 UTC
It may, or may not be duplicate. I do not know, this is not the full 
stacktrace and definitely it is the least interesting part of it. Let's assume 
it is duplicated, unless the reporter can provide full (at leat 100 lines) of 
the stack overflow. 
Comment 3 cbulcu 2005-11-09 13:16:10 UTC
Created attachment 26760 [details]
log file
Comment 4 Marian Mirilovic 2005-11-09 13:41:02 UTC
Yarda, please look at the attached stack-trace. I bet it's the same.
Comment 5 Jaroslav Tulach 2005-11-09 13:52:12 UTC
Really duplicate. Already fixed in the branch. 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 68318 ***