This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 9021 - 'r-o' Property fields in Revision Explorer is posible to modify
Summary: 'r-o' Property fields in Revision Explorer is posible to modify
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P4 normal (vote)
Assignee: David Strupl
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-01-05 17:19 UTC by dmladek
Modified: 2008-12-22 21:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description dmladek 2001-01-05 17:19:11 UTC 
[Pilsen 010103_1]
linux 2.2.16-22smp
jdk1.3.0_01SUN
===================
In Revision Explorer there is a property tab on its right side.
Property's names are shaded (saying:they are read-only)
but if you click on ... buton there you can EDIT and lost
your changes.
IMHO, it shouldn't alove to user that he can edit any property.
Comment 1 dmladek 2001-01-08 10:57:59 UTC 
...eh, probably I made a misstake and this bug should go under
"OpenIde" product.

And briefly again about problem:
IMHO IDE should behave in one unified way!!!
That is eg. r-o stuffs like source files in editor is not allowed
to edit, than r-o property shouldn't be allowed to edit. Even that
your changes are throwen away.

Am I clear?
thanks
Daniel
Comment 2 Jan Chalupa 2001-03-12 12:09:40 UTC 
Version: 'Dev' -> 3.2
Comment 3 Martin Entlicher 2001-04-03 17:29:02 UTC 
The default String property editor is used here. It should be fixed globally for
the whole IDE. Therefore reassigning back to openide.
Comment 4 Jan Chalupa 2001-05-06 08:11:28 UTC 
Target milestone -> 3.3
Comment 5 _ ttran 2001-09-14 15:47:22 UTC 
PropertySheet?
Comment 6 Jan Zajicek 2001-09-17 13:18:52 UTC 
Looks like this was fixed recently - se i.e dev#20010914.
Comment 7 Jan Zajicek 2001-09-17 13:19:46 UTC 
verified
Comment 8 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 16:32:52 UTC 
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.