This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 97050 - [GTK] Two different backgrounds in treeviews
Summary: [GTK] Two different backgrounds in treeviews
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 110739
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Window System (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: David Simonek
URL:
Keywords: L&F
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-02 09:41 UTC by Petr Chytil
Modified: 2008-12-22 13:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
screen shot - two different backgrounds in tree view (9.29 KB, application/octet-stream)
2007-03-02 09:42 UTC, Petr Chytil 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petr Chytil 2007-03-02 09:41:46 UTC 
NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200702281900)
1.6.0_01; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.6.0_01-b04
Linux version 2.6.17-11-generic running on i386
en_US (nb); UTF-8

Ubuntu 6.10, default theme setting.

See screenshot (red arrow points to border between backgrounds).

Is it necessary to have different background for lines with and without a tree
node? It only occurs with specific themes (unfortunately in default theme of our
"supported" distribution - Ubuntu).

Do we want it? Can we do something about it, or is it JDK's problem?
Comment 1 Petr Chytil 2007-03-02 09:42:27 UTC 
Created attachment 39099 [details]
screen shot - two different backgrounds in tree view
Comment 2 Petr Nejedly 2007-03-02 14:33:07 UTC 
Dafe, any explanation at hand?
Comment 3 Antonin Nebuzelsky 2008-02-06 15:28:23 UTC 
Not only problem of the explorer but of more similar components which have multiline areas.

Perhaps a duplicate?
Comment 4 David Simonek 2008-03-25 16:37:35 UTC 
Yes I'm convinced this is also caused by 110739 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 110739 ***