Issue 20883 - Q-PCD Digital Signatures and Encryption
Summary: Q-PCD Digital Signatures and Encryption
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: Other Other OS
: P3 Trivial with 3 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: frank.loehmann
QA Contact: issues@framework
: 5903 10407 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Reported: 2003-10-08 12:27 UTC by frank.loehmann
Modified: 2005-01-20 15:23 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description frank.loehmann 2003-10-08 12:27:22 UTC
Task tracking system for Childs


General Security Digital Signatures and Encryption

Product Requirement 
An average user with no specific knowledge about security technologies should be
able to sign and encrypt documents.

Customer Need/Problem
Since digital signatures and encryption will be heavily used in the government
space, many citizens with low or average PC skill will want or have to use
digital security technologies. Therefore, they have to be very easy to use and
well documented.


Eng Effort

Eng Owner
Matthias Huetsch / Lutz Hoeger

Product Concept
Initial concept: Learn from competing applications User Interaction. Detailed
concept needs to be provided by User Experience Team.

Functional Specification

MHU->LHO: The more I think about this, the more I conclude that this a meta
task requiring 'ease of use' for all signature / encryption functionality that
your team is designing for the Writer / Calc / ... teams.

Thus, can you please take care of this (e.g. delegate to FL)?

LHO->FL: Frank, I agree with Matthias. Please include into the signature
Comment 1 frank.loehmann 2003-10-13 15:06:41 UTC
*** Issue 5903 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 rcipapo 2003-10-14 08:48:15 UTC
I just read this enews
Adobe and Microsoft are now battling for new standard in e-forms. 
Both companies are pushing their own propritiery products.  
Microsoft has XDocs (now its Infopath) and Adobe has PDF. Both has 
now support for XML and digital signature.  Is XML will play a big 
role on implementation of digital signature on OpenOffice?
Comment 3 lutz.hoeger 2003-10-23 07:45:33 UTC
added keyword Q-PCD
Comment 4 frank.loehmann 2004-04-07 11:07:21 UTC
Comment 5 frank.loehmann 2004-04-07 17:29:31 UTC
Comment 6 thomas.lange 2004-04-20 13:05:13 UTC
TL->GT: OS said this one was for you.
Comment 7 gunnar.timm 2004-05-10 11:05:12 UTC
Comment 8 Martin Hollmichel 2004-05-28 15:11:13 UTC
according to the announcement on releases
( this issue
will be re-targeted to OOo Later.
Comment 9 matthias.huetsch 2004-06-01 12:49:05 UTC
Hi Frank,

This is an 'ease of use' meta task for signature / encryption functionality that
*will* be
implemented for OOo 2.0, and thus needs to be taken care as well.

I'm thus re-prioritizing (P5 to P3) and re-targeting ('OOo Later' to 'OOo 2.0')
this task.
Also, I'm not sure that GT is the correct owner (and all those '.' comments
don't help either)
so I'm reassigning to you.

Comment 10 gunnar.timm 2004-06-18 12:33:57 UTC
Comment 11 frank.loehmann 2004-06-29 12:10:13 UTC
FL->EM: Now ready for translation
Comment 12 e.matthis 2004-06-29 13:35:38 UTC
sent out for external review; planned done July 7
Comment 13 vd 2004-06-30 09:49:09 UTC
Just CC'ing myself and whats the status for this issue ? Is it really target
OOo2.0 ? 
Comment 14 e.matthis 2004-07-06 19:51:33 UTC
rev done, Changes coming via mail.
Comment 15 frank.loehmann 2004-08-10 11:39:06 UTC
Please find the specification here:
Status is still draft, because we need approval of FST from QA.
Comment 16 lutz.hoeger 2004-09-03 11:13:32 UTC
According to FST the spec has been finally approved by the i-team, and the CWS
is already being integrated. So QA has already verified the feature
implementation being compliance with the specification. LHO->FL: FIXED/VERIFIED?
Comment 17 frank.loehmann 2004-09-07 14:41:54 UTC
FL: Changed status to fixed.
Comment 18 frank.loehmann 2004-09-07 14:59:43 UTC
FL: Verified.
Comment 19 frank.loehmann 2004-11-29 14:45:27 UTC
Seen good in src680 m63.
Comment 20 frank 2005-01-20 15:23:32 UTC
*** Issue 10407 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***