Issue 59734 - similarity search for multiple words failed
Summary: similarity search for multiple words failed
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0.1
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
Keywords: oooqa
: 128379 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Reported: 2005-12-24 03:10 UTC by ahung
Modified: 2020-05-30 17:24 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Confirmation in: 4.1.7
Developer Difficulty: ---

poc (7.86 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2005-12-24 03:11 UTC, ahung
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ahung 2005-12-24 03:10:05 UTC

similarity search for multiple words failed
1.ctrl-f to find
2.type the first line (see above) into search field more options
4.tick similarity search search but can't find it in document

similarity search for exact line failed
6.repeat the above search by copying the first line and pasting it in search 

However, searching for a single word “sell†including quotes works.  Standard 
search for exact line also works.
Comment 1 ahung 2005-12-24 03:11:07 UTC
Created attachment 32681 [details]
Comment 2 lars 2005-12-24 11:51:20 UTC
confiremd on Windows XP Pro SP2 with OOo 2.0.1
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2006-01-03 09:00:33 UTC
Reassigned to SBA.
Comment 4 stefan.baltzer 2006-01-04 18:43:18 UTC
SBA: When it was designed, the main purpose for similarity search was to find
variants of lengish words, and not parts of sentences (several words). 
However, even the default "2,2,2+combined" looks tempting to look for phrases.
Thus, I can accept this as a defect, but the Prio is P4.
Reassigned to OS.
Comment 5 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:24:27 UTC
Reset assigne to the default "".
Comment 6 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:25:51 UTC
Reset assigne to the default "".
Comment 7 Peter 2020-05-30 17:23:13 UTC
*** Issue 128379 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 Peter 2020-05-30 17:24:34 UTC
This is not a defect. The scope is clear, and unchganged. So I classify this as enhancement.