Issue 71535 - Ease selection of all text with the same formatting
Summary: Ease selection of all text with the same formatting
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 107050
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: formatting (show other issues)
Version: OOO320m9
Hardware: All All
: P3 Normal with 4 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-14 16:02 UTC by dielec
Modified: 2017-05-20 10:13 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: 4.1.0-dev
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Attachment shows example behaviour (21.74 KB, image/jpeg)
2014-04-06 22:36 UTC, dielec
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description dielec 2006-11-14 16:02:14 UTC
In Microsoft Word it's easy to select all text with the same formatting in a
Word (>2002) document using the "Styles and Formatting" task pane. This can be
helpful for viewing the text, changing its formatting or deleting it.

To select all text with the same formatting in Word you can open the "Styles and
Formatting" task pane, and then click a word that's formatted like the text you
want to select. (The formatting description will appear under "Formatting of
selected text" in the "Styles and Formatting" task pane.) In the "Styles and
Formatting" task pane, click "Select All". Now you can apply the actions you want.

I really would like to see an option like this in OpenOffice Writer. It's soarly
missing for professional editors like me. Several colleges complained about this
to me.
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2006-11-14 16:31:20 UTC
Reassigned to SBA.
Comment 2 stefan.baltzer 2007-05-06 00:09:18 UTC
SBA: Professionals (even editors :-) should know about the tool they earn their
living with. For OOo users, this is the use of (paragraph and character) styles.
The change of a style will change all text with the respective style applied.
Very cool feature that eases the work of people who have to use a word processor
day by day.

Non-professional users who use hard formatting indeed have a slightly harder way
to change "All text with hard attributes" (i.e. bold+italic+16pt+Font XYZ). This
works with "Edit - Find and replace". Don't enter a search string, but click on
format and select the attributes to search for. Thus the original summary "not
possible to select all text with same formatting" is WRONG.

However, selecting text without further research of its attributes to have an
easier way to search is a valid feature/enhancement request.

Correcting summary.
Reassigned to requirements.
Comment 3 dielec 2007-07-24 10:45:33 UTC
Off course we work with styles. This is exactly what this feature request is all
about.

To explain what I mean, please read the paragraph "Style/format based selection"
at http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-6270_11-5053964.html

See the "Select all 3 instances" in "Figure B"? This makes it very easy to
change one style into another: select all the instances of a style and just
click another style. This feature is available since Word XP / 2002. Word
creates a style for every paragraph with a different formatting.

Use case: Suppose you receive a document from someone who does not know about
styles or uses other style names that your corporate workflow is not accustomed
to. With this feature you can easily adapt all styles without having to do a
"Search and replace" for each style instance. When working with many different
external editors this comes in really handy.
Comment 4 Regina Henschel 2007-07-24 14:31:43 UTC
For paragraph styles this feature is in Edit > Find & Replace. Click on "More
Options" and check "Search for styles".
For character formatting you can select the relevant attribute and format. I
don't know a way to search for character styles.
Comment 5 dielec 2007-07-24 14:45:32 UTC
We use that, but we find it less userfriendly than MS solution.
Comment 6 dielec 2010-02-15 15:03:24 UTC
I really would like to raise attention to my previous reported enhancement. To
illustrate what I meant, here's a link

http://www.ithelpdesk.qut.edu.au/KPAKS/Microsoft%20Word%202003/099691124972716.JPG

It especially comes in handy when dealing with freelancers. Thank you.
Comment 7 jeanbaptisteb 2010-02-15 16:47:33 UTC
At Revues.org (http://www.revues.org/?lang=en), where I work, we strongly
support that kind of improvement. 

Word processors are a central part of our workflow (to publish over 200 open
access scholarly journals). As this kind of functionality is only available on
Microsoft Word, we have to use it instead of Open Office. 

We would like to switch to Open Office, but this is currently impossible: it
would lead to a too important loss of productivity. 

I totally agree with delec: the "Search for styles" option is far less
userfriendly than the MS solution.
Comment 8 eric.savary 2010-03-01 07:50:32 UTC
Please don't change targets and priorities of your own.
Comment 9 jean-baptiste.bertrand 2012-03-19 10:09:45 UTC
Is not this request a duplicate of https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=7861 ?
Comment 10 Edwin Sharp 2014-04-06 13:34:23 UTC
Please attach real life example (links in comment 3, comment 6 not working)
Comment 11 dielec 2014-04-06 22:36:47 UTC
Created attachment 83111 [details]
Attachment shows example behaviour
Comment 12 dielec 2014-04-06 22:38:50 UTC
Here is a Microsoft Knowledgebase article that describes the expected behavior:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/292084/en-us

Thanks for reviewing.
Comment 13 Edwin Sharp 2014-04-07 05:43:29 UTC
Confirmed with
AOO410m15(Build:9761)  -  Rev. 1583666
2014-04-01 13:50 - Linux x86_64
Debian
Comment 14 Edwin Sharp 2014-04-07 19:09:50 UTC
Duplicate bug

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 107050 ***
Comment 15 dielec 2014-04-08 16:54:49 UTC
I'm okay with this bug being a duplicate, but since I filed it in 2006 and bug 107050 originates from 2009, shouldn't it be the other way around?
Comment 16 dielec 2014-04-08 17:00:24 UTC
@jean-baptiste.bertrand I don't think it duplicates that bug.
Comment 17 Edwin Sharp 2014-04-08 17:26:55 UTC
(In reply to dielec from comment #15)
> I'm okay with this bug being a duplicate, but since I filed it in 2006 and
> bug 107050 originates from 2009, shouldn't it be the other way around?

Perhaps, but it was confirmed first.
Usually the bug with most information should be the un-duplicated one.
But this is a mere status change - all duplicates should be reviewed before actual implementation.