Issue 8167 - A dependent function,?Every? of the Line Numbering shows variation in its settings in accordance with changing the values in Text field.
Summary: A dependent function,?Every? of the Line Numbering shows variation in its set...
Status: ACCEPTED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC2
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-10-09 05:20 UTC by sujit
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:25 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description sujit 2002-10-09 05:20:32 UTC
A dependent function,”Every” of the Line Numbering shows variation in its 
settings in accordance with changing the values in Text field.

System Configuration 
Platform: PC
OS: WinXP, NT 5.01
Version: 2600

Steps to replicate bug

1.	Select Tools->Line Numbering 

2.	Check “Show Numbering” field

3.	Observe the “Every” field of the separator section.

4.	Enter a character and delete it by pressing back space

5.	Follow step 3

Notes
We find that the “Every” field is activated the first time and after following 
the fourth step the same field is deactivated. This appears to be a simple 
bug, but is important since it shows inconsistencies in the working of the 
program. Such occurrences would confuse the user since the same function is 
working differently for no apparent reason. Therefore I feel that the “Every” 
text box should be disabled if there is no value in the text field, even when 
we are checking the “show numbering” for the first time.

The bug itself seems easy enough to fix. When the value of the text field is 
reset to null, the every box gets disabled. So all that needs to be done would 
be to go to the part of the code dealing with this and not disable the 
checking of the “Every” box. Since it will be very easy for the developers to 
fix this bug, I feel that this should be fixed as soon as possible.
Comment 1 diane 2002-10-09 13:31:36 UTC
*** Issue 8168 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 diane 2002-10-09 13:33:01 UTC
*** Issue 8169 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 3 diane 2002-10-09 13:35:01 UTC
*** Issue 8170 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 diane 2002-10-09 13:36:18 UTC
*** Issue 8171 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 sujit 2002-11-26 22:02:24 UTC
would like the open office team to look into this matter.
Comment 6 tamblyne 2003-08-07 05:40:43 UTC
Hi -- I apologize for the delay in getting back to you on this issue.  

The latest release of OpenOffice.org is 1.1rc2, in which I was unable
to reproduce the bug referenced in this issue.  

Please advise if upgrading has solved the problem for you.  

Thank you, 

Tam  

Comment 7 jack.warchold 2003-08-07 15:52:46 UTC
jw: changed owner to jw
change Prio to P4
change Version to OOo 1.1 RC2
changed status to confirmed -> new
reproduced on OOo 1.1
Comment 8 jack.warchold 2003-08-08 11:00:11 UTC
jw: reassigned to os
Comment 9 Oliver Specht 2003-08-08 11:20:27 UTC
.
Comment 10 stefan.baltzer 2003-10-07 10:36:04 UTC
SBA: According to the OpenOffice.org roadmap 
http://tools.openoffice.org/releases this issue was retargeted to "OOo
Later".
Comment 11 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:24:39 UTC
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".
Comment 12 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:25:50 UTC
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".