Issue 83068 - Image placement is buggy when anchored to a paragraph with non null "spacing below paragraph" parameter
Summary: Image placement is buggy when anchored to a paragraph with non null "spacing ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 70582
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: formatting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.3
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial with 2 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-10-28 22:00 UTC by alexisg
Modified: 2007-10-31 11:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
example file showing placement bug (56.69 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.writer)
2007-10-28 22:01 UTC, alexisg
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description alexisg 2007-10-28 22:00:59 UTC
There seem to be no bug report for that issue... When I want to move an image
with the keyboard in the writer, it's not moving in the right direction. It's
very difficult to place exactly where I want in that condition.

I've found that the problem only happens when image is anchored to paragraphs
which style include spacing below paragraph.

For the text body, which actually is the major part of the document, I am able
to hack this problem by removing spacing below paragraph and adding spacing
above paragraph, but this does not solve all the situations (ie puttung an
anchor to a heading)
Comment 1 alexisg 2007-10-28 22:01:51 UTC
Created attachment 49211 [details]
example file showing placement bug
Comment 2 alexisg 2007-10-28 22:03:37 UTC
Just to say that I had this bug on mac, windows and linux, with the 2.3 version,
but also 2.2 and 2.1...
Comment 3 Regina Henschel 2007-10-28 23:33:37 UTC
It seems, that it does not depend on the style of the paragraph, to which the
image is anchored, but to the paragraph just above it.

I can reproduce it with a new document in SRC680m233 on WinXP.
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2007-10-31 11:23:19 UTC
Same problem as issue 70582.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 70582 ***
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2007-10-31 11:34:43 UTC
Closing duplicate.