Issue 83971 - font-weight: bold is not respected
Summary: font-weight: bold is not respected
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 70981
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: open-import (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.3
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: spreadsheet
QA Contact: issues@sc
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Reported: 2007-11-26 12:58 UTC by ikostenko
Modified: 2007-11-27 13:17 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Example file: .ods file with HTML content (3.85 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.calc)
2007-11-26 12:59 UTC, ikostenko
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ikostenko 2007-11-26 12:58:15 UTC
When opening an HTML file which contains font-weight: bold, OO spreadsheet
doesn't  respect this parameter. I.e. the text has a regular font type instead
of bold.
Comment 1 ikostenko 2007-11-26 12:59:40 UTC
Created attachment 49898 [details]
Example file: .ods file with HTML content
Comment 2 ikostenko 2007-11-26 13:08:16 UTC
Example: open the attached file: lines 8, 9, and 11 should contain bold text.
If you look into the source of the document (which is HTML in fact), you will
see these lines do contain font-weight: bold parameter. 
The cell is formatted with bold only in case it is inside <th> tag (Table header).
Comment 3 Rainer Bielefeld 2007-11-27 04:38:07 UTC
"Finance.ods" is a HTML document with wront file name extension "ods".
Using OOo Dialogues in File Menu it will be opened in WRITER (correct),
doubleclick in WIN EXPLORER will open it in CALC (incorrect).

I don't believe that "opening files with wrong file name extension from WIN
EXPLORER" is an OOo issue.

Pls. specify your OS and Platform!
Comment 4 frank 2007-11-27 13:15:38 UTC
Re-opened as the comment from Rainer does not fit into the problem with not
importing fontweight bold statements
Comment 5 frank 2007-11-27 13:16:40 UTC
basically a double to Issue 70981 .

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 70981 ***
Comment 6 frank 2007-11-27 13:17:05 UTC
closed double