Issue 89814 - Several formatting issues with text prior to otherwise formatted text
Summary: Several formatting issues with text prior to otherwise formatted text
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 89252
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: formatting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 3.0 Beta
Hardware: All All
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-05-22 22:35 UTC by typist
Modified: 2008-05-23 20:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description typist 2008-05-22 22:35:23 UTC
It seems that the formatting symbol 'phi' inbetween two differently formatted
lines/paragraphs is 'spreading' its formatting-rules towards the upper text and
it also tends to spread the format up to in front of the actual formatted text:

E.g., when using underlining on a text behind '-' created with the 'auto-bullets
& numbering'-wizard, the underlining will also spread towards the empty
tab-space in front of the text like this: '-__sometext' this underlining even
cannot be re-formatted. Similarly, when choosing '1.5 line-spacing' on the last
line of a paragraph (to have some more space between 2 paragraphs), all other
(non-marked) lines above will be afflicted by the formatting, too (Note: this
only happens, if no 'return' comes at the end of lines).

typist
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2008-05-23 09:49:30 UTC
Same as issue 89252.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 89252 ***
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2008-05-23 09:56:04 UTC
Closing duplicate.
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2008-05-23 13:41:19 UTC
MRU->typist: As far as I am able to see, your issue 89814 has been marked as
duplicate of issue 89252... and not of issue 18463, which is unresolved and
targeted to be resolved in OOo 3.0. So please calm down.
Comment 4 typist 2008-05-23 20:10:28 UTC
yes, you are right! sorry for that. apparently, I missed the fact, that issue
89252 wasn't closed and re-linked to issue 18463, there's just reference to it.
actually I thought it was an age-old bug, like most of the other one's I
reported before - that's also why my reaction was a little harsh. can't judge,
whether it's a re-introduction of a bug in this case, or a new one, though.

typist